-
Rick Macklem authored
The Linux client is now attempting to use the Secinfo_no_name operation for NFSv4.1/4.2 mounts. Although it does not seem to mind the NFSERR_NOTSUPP reply, adding support for it seems reasonable. I also noticed that "savflag" needed to be 64bits in nfsrvd_secinfo() since nd_flag in now 64bits, so I changed the declaration of it there. I also added code to set "vp" NULL after performing Secinfo/Secinfo_no_name, since these operations consume the current FH, which is represented by "vp" in nfsrvd_compound(). Fixing when the server replies NFSERR_WRONGSEC so that it conforms to RFC5661 Sec. 2.6 still needs to be done in a future commit. MFC after: 2 weeks
947bd247